Ma Ying-jeou was accused of "instigating murder". The informant said that NT$ 300 million "shooting balance" had not been paid.

CCTV WeChat official account’s "Direct Access to Taiwan Province" No.11 reported that Cai Zhengyuan, the former chief executive of the Kuomintang Policy Committee, had just been transferred and taken into custody for the China Film Trading case, and now an extra-case case broke out. On August 10, 2007, Weng Bingyao, who instigated his younger brother to shoot at the Cai Zhengyuan service office of the then Chairman of China Film and a legislator of the Kuomintang, turned himself in at the Taipei District Prosecutor’s Office and reported that Ma Ying-jeou, Guo Taiqiang, Luo Yuzhen and Zhuang Wanjun, the vice chairman of China Film, were behind the shooting.

Weng Bingyao (Source: China Times News)

Weng Bingyao said that the reason why he came out to surrender now is because Ma Ying-jeou was in power for the first ten years, even if he came out to talk about it, it would be useless. He also suggested that the prosecution should track down Li Quanjiao, the former speaker of Tainan City, because Li Quanjiao is a middleman and a matchmaker.

Weng Bingyao said that before the shooting, Cai Zhengyuan seemed to get wind and hide, but "the boss" instructed him to shoot, because "the junior high school film was to be re-elected in August of that year, so if Cai Zhengyuan was shot to death, nothing would happen." Weng Bingyao said that he had to bite the bullet and go to the service office to shoot and send bullets to intimidate.

Weng Bingyao’s appointed lawyer, Zhou Wurong, pointed the finger at Ma Ying-jeou, saying that Ma Ying-jeou had two dinners in March 2007 before the shooting, one with Lien Chan, the honorary chairman of the Kuomintang, and the other with Wang Jinping and Guo Taiqiang, the then "Legislative Yuan", which proved that Guo Taiqiang was connected with Ma Ying-jeou. At that time, Cai Zhengyuan was controversial because she didn’t want to step down as the chairman of China Film. Luo Yuzhen, Guo Taiqiang’s wife, told the KMT Central Committee in April 2007 that she didn’t want to play, but some Kuomintang people insisted that she buy it.

Who is behind the scenes of the old case?

The shooting in Cai Zhengyuan Service took place on July 28th, 2007. According to the information of the police investigation 10 years ago, a mysterious person did find Gan Xiancheng, the eldest brother of the "Dongmen Gang" in Tainan, and drew up a murder plan, asking NT$ 10 million. Gan Xiancheng arranged with Weng Bingyao again, but he didn’t expect the gunman to run away when he got cold feet, and he changed men to shoot at the Cai Zhengyuan service office.

According to Weng Bingyao, a Tainan banquet two weeks after the shooting was the key to convince him that Ma Ying-jeou, Guo Taiqiang and others were involved in the case, and Li Quanjiao was the "matchmaker".

According to the information of the police, this banquet did exist in that year, but the thread led by Li Quanjiao was not to shoot Cai Zhengyuan, but to hope that Cai Zhengyuan would "step aside" after taking some money. Guo Taiqiang, I’m afraid, is only the gold owner who was found to buy China Film.

The shooting was planned and started in March and April, 2007. Because of the twists and turns in the process, it was delayed until July 28th, 2007, which seemed to have nothing to do with Cai Zhengyuan’s defeat in the KMT’s "Central Standing Committee" election that day.

Cai Zhengyuan (Source: Network)

Zhuang Wanjun, then vice chairman of China Film, fought Cai Zhengyuan against Taiwan because of the dispute over the right to operate, so the prosecutors suspected that Zhuang Wanjun was the instigator of the shooting, but Weng Bingyao told the media on the 10th that Zhuang Wanjun himself had no motive and was not qualified, so it was impossible for him to instigate the shooting, as it was rumored at that time.

Weng Bingyao emphasized that when the shooting broke out, he was dismissed after being interrogated by the Shilin District Inspection Office. Later, the Taipei District Prosecutor’s Office came to you again, and the prosecutor asked him, "Do you know Guo Taiqiang? Did Guo Taiqiang call you? " At that time, he gave false testimony for Guo Taiqiang.

Ten years ago, Cai Zhengyuan almost lost his life.

On July 28th, 2007, Cai Zhengyuan, then a "legislator" of the Kuomintang, was shot twice at the gate of the service office on Chenggong Road in Neihu, one shot broke through the gate, and the other shot jammed, which was a strong warning.

At that time, the police formed a project team to trace it and found that the cause was the dispute over the management right of China Film. In October 2007, the police first arrested three gunmen, including Weng Bingyao, his accomplice Wang Zongjing and Zhang Chenyong, who retired from Keelung Port Authority. In January 2008, the police arrested Gan Xiancheng and his personal younger brother Chen Qingde again.

According to the data at that time, in March and April of 2007, Gan Xiancheng was entrusted by a "mysterious person" to kill Cai Zhengyuan at a price of 10 million. Gan Xiancheng was already a terminal cancer patient at that time, and he found Weng Bingyao, the corner leader who also hung out in Tainan’s "Park Gang", to deal with it.

Weng Bingyao first found Wang Zongjing, a Taiwanese businessman engaged in aquaculture in Vietnam, and Wang found a younger brother as a gunman. Unexpectedly, after taking the "Qian Jin" of 1 million yuan, the younger brother ran away because he was afraid of being finally destroyed, and also reported to Cai Zhengyuan and the police. Weng Bingyao and Wang Zongjing had to find another three people, including Zhang Chenyong, but the promised reward was greatly reduced. On average, one gunman only got about NT$ 100,000.

On July 23, 2007, Zhang Chenyong and other three people first explored the terrain, including the Cai Zhengyuan service office and the home in Xinyi District, and finally selected the service office to shoot. On July 28th, three people ran to the service office in Cai Zhengyuan, two of them started work and one kept watch, and fired two shots with Beretta pistols at the door of the service office on the second floor, when Cai Zhengyuan was not in the service office.

After the incident, Cai Zhengyuan suddenly resigned as the chairman of China Film, and the KMT’s "Central Standing Committee" election was also unsuccessful. Gan Xiancheng, one of the planners of the shooting, died of cancer not long ago. It is a mystery who asked Gan Xiancheng for help in killing Cai Zhengyuan.  

Weng Bingyao: NT$ 300 million "shooting balance" has not been given yet.

Weng Bingyao was finally sentenced to five years and five months in prison and released on parole in January 2012. Ten years later, accompanied by a lawyer, he suddenly went to the Taipei District Prosecutor’s Office to "surrender and report" on the grounds that he wanted to recover the shooting reward.

He said that before the shooting, he would be paid 10% of the selling price of China Film, that is, NT$ 320 million (about 70 million RMB), but after the shooting, he got nothing. Only Zhuang Qitian, the younger brother of Zhuang Wanjun, the vice chairman of China Film, sent him NT$ 20 million when he was in prison, which made him feel cheated. He was also rumored by the "street" that he had embezzled the final payment and failed to find Guo Taiqiang many times.

The parties responded: the accusation was "ridiculous", the accusation was falsely accused, and "boring did not respond"

Xu Qiaoxin, spokesman of Ma Ying-jeou’s office, strongly refuted this, saying that "there is no evidence and random accusations". Xu Qiaoxin said that the shooting took place on July 28, 2007. Ma Ying-jeou was the party chairman for the first time from August 19, 2005 to February 13, 2007, and the second time was already in 2009. It can be seen that Mr. Weng’s statement is completely unreasonable only from the point of time, and Ma Ying-jeou has no reason to participate in this shooting. Among the others named, Guo Taiqiang said that he would counter the accusation of false accusation, while Li Quanjiao said that he was "bored and didn’t respond".

Xu Qiaoxin (Source: Facebook)

In this regard, the Hong Kong Central Rating Society quickly commented on the 10 th that Ma Ying-jeou instigated murder? Isn’t it even more explosive than Chen Shui-bian’s case? Chen Shui-bian’s charge is nothing but corruption. It is said that "there are mental disorders everywhere these days, and three-year-old children can make lies that they won’t believe, which is really disgusting to the extreme." Some people also reminded Ma Ying-jeou that he really should be careful, because his opponent stubbornly engaged in the "China Film Case" and his goal was him. Ma Ying-jeou never touches the pot, and often promises his innocence. Unfortunately, he has more than 10 lawsuits and often goes to court. Ma Ying-jeou was also the defendant in the "Three China Cases" where the investigation has been restarted. Ma Ying-jeou may be shocked to see Cai Zhengyuan’s "say yes and bet". The judiciary is green, and the courts are no longer run by the Kuomintang. The accusation of "instigating murder" has come out, and it is just the beginning of the play.

Countdown of state-owned assets transfer social security! Trillion state-owned disability pension

  The reform of transferring state-owned assets to social security entered the countdown stage in December. According to the established timetable, China will basically complete the transfer of central and local state-owned enterprises by the end of 2020.

  Central enterprises have taken the lead in transferring social security. As early as 2019, they completed the transfer of 1.3 trillion yuan from 81 enterprises, and the transfer of local state-owned enterprises will reach its climax in 2020. From the beginning of the year to the end of the year, various provinces have issued transfer plans and demanded that the transfer plan be basically completed by the end of this year.

  The latest policy is Beijing. On December 8, the Beijing Municipal Government announced the Implementation Plan for Beijing to Transfer Part of State-owned Capital to Enrich the Social Security Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Plan). The "Proposal" proposes that the transfer ratio should be unified to 10% of the state-owned shares of enterprises included in the transfer scope, so as to ensure that the transfer work will be basically completed by the end of 2020.

  2020 is an important time node for the reform of China’s endowment insurance system. This year, we should not only complete the transfer of state-owned assets, but also realize the provincial-level overall planning of endowment insurance funds. These two reforms will lay the foundation for the next national overall planning.

  Dong Dengxin, director of the Institute of Financial Securities of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, told CBN that according to the plans of provinces, the shares transferred by local state-owned assets are stored in financial accounts and entrusted to state-owned holding investment companies for value-added and value-added operation, but this kind of local management is in a transitional state of escrow. Once the national pension insurance is coordinated, the social security fund managed by the provincial government and the state-owned shares transferred by state-owned assets will be managed by the National Social Security Fund Council.

  At the same time, CBN learned that the Ministry of Finance is taking the lead in drafting operational management measures for the transfer of state-owned capital. The documents issued in some places this year clearly stated that after the introduction of the management measures for the transfer of state-owned capital by the central government, the local financial departments will separately formulate corresponding specific implementation measures.

  More than one trillion state-owned running to help the pension.

  The above-mentioned "Proposal" proposes that Beijing will enrich the social security fund by transferring some state-owned capital, and establish an operating mechanism that combines the transfer of state-owned capital with the gradual filling of the gap in the basic endowment insurance fund for enterprise employees, so that the people can share the development achievements of state-owned enterprises, realize intergenerational equity and enhance the sustainability of the system.

  The impact of aging on the financial situation of China’s old-age insurance fund is increasingly obvious. The arrival of the first generation of "baby boom" retirement peak requires China to strengthen the sustainability of the old-age insurance fund.

  In November 2017, China launched a pilot project of state-owned assets transfer, which was fully launched in September 2019. At the central level, qualified enterprises were required to be basically completed by the end of 2019, and difficult enterprises could be completed by the end of 2020; At the local level, the transfer work will be basically completed by the end of 2020.

  By the end of 2019, the central level has completed the transfer of 1.3 trillion yuan. The industry predicts that the total scale after the transfer will be 3 trillion to 5 trillion yuan, which means that at least 2 trillion yuan will be completed before the end of 2020.

  These 2 trillion funds will provide an important guarantee for China’s old-age insurance system, especially in the case that the old-age insurance fund has been greatly reduced due to the epidemic, and the acceleration of the transfer of state-owned assets to social security has also provided a "reassuring" for the majority of insured people.

  The epidemic did not hinder the transfer of state-owned assets to social security. When consulting local documents, CBN found that since the end of March, when the epidemic eased slightly, many provinces began to introduce plans for allocating social security by state-owned assets. For example, Henan, Hunan and other places introduced plans in April, Chongqing in July, Shanghai in September, and after entering November, Shandong, Gansu, Beijing and other places also promptly introduced relevant plans.

  State-owned assets are earmarked to make up for the pension gap.

  From the content point of view, the schemes in different places are basically the same, and the transfer scope, transfer target and income mode are consistent with the principle of "Notice of the State Council on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Plan for Transferring Part of State-owned Capital to Enrich Social Security Fund" (Guo Fa [2017] No.49), for example, the transfer ratio is 10% of the state-owned equity of the enterprise, and the undertaker does not interfere with the daily production, operation and management of the enterprise.

  Beijing’s "Proposal" reiterates that the equity dividends and operating income after the transfer of state-owned assets shall be collected in a timely manner by the Municipal Finance Bureau, taking into account the expenditure needs of the basic old-age insurance fund and the income of state-owned capital, and shall be used exclusively to make up for the gap in the basic old-age insurance fund for enterprise employees, and shall not be included in the budget management of state-owned capital operation. Before the introduction of the management measures for the transfer of state-owned capital, the scope of investment was limited to bank deposits, the purchase of government bonds in the primary market and the capital increase of the transfer target. The entrusted management company is responsible for the specific operation of equity dividends.

  Earlier, when the transfer of state-owned assets was fully pushed forward, the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Finance said in a reporter’s question that after the transfer of state-owned capital to enrich the social security fund, the way for the undertaker to obtain income was "dividend-based, supplemented by operation". That is to say, the income of state-owned capital mainly comes from equity dividends. In the future, the financial departments at the same level of each undertaking entity will consider the expenditure needs of the basic old-age insurance fund and the income of state-owned capital as a whole, and implement the collection in a timely manner to make up for the gap of the basic old-age insurance fund for enterprise employees.

  In addition, another principle of state-owned assets transfer is to be a "sleeping shareholder", that is, the undertaker, as a financial investor, enjoys the right to income, the right to dispose of and the right to know the state-owned shares, does not interfere with the daily production and operation management of enterprises, and generally does not send directors to enterprises.

  When combing the local documents, CBN also found that the local governments are slightly different in undertaking subjects, and most provinces are authorized by the finance department. For example, the state-owned shares of enterprises transferred by Jilin Province are held by the provincial finance department on behalf of the provincial government, and Jilin Equity Fund Investment Co., Ltd. is the undertaking subject, but there are also some provinces that are different. For example, Heilongjiang Province authorized the provincial SASAC as the undertaking subject of the state-owned shares of enterprises transferred by the province.

  Judging from the progress of local transfer, Hebei has announced that 21 provincial state-owned enterprises have transferred some state-owned assets to enrich the social security fund and transferred state-owned capital of 19.326 billion yuan; Guangxi announced the completion of the transfer of 18 state-owned enterprises at the district level.

  Measures for the operation and management of state-owned capital will be introduced

  Transferring some state-owned capital to enrich the social security fund is an important measure to reform and improve China’s basic old-age insurance system, and it is also a full embodiment of the sharing of the development achievements of state-owned enterprises by the whole people.

  A local state-owned enterprise told the First Financial Reporter that the transfer process is much more difficult than expected, and both central enterprises and local state-owned enterprises have different degrees of difficulties. Local state-owned enterprises have greater difficulties, so it takes longer to transfer the reserved funds.

  He said that the number of local state-owned enterprises is large and the situation is complicated. In some places, the property rights of state-owned enterprises have not been completely straightened out, and it is impossible to determine the number of transfers. In some places, state-owned enterprises are not well managed or even face bankruptcy, which makes it impossible to transfer them. Some enterprises have changed the scope and scale of transfer due to the implementation of reforms such as reorganization and restructuring. Others involve listed companies, especially overseas listed companies, and the transfer process is more complicated.

  The above-mentioned state-owned enterprises also said that at present, the undertakers in different provinces are not the same, some are social security fund councils, while others are state-owned capital operation companies, and the process of transfer is not smooth due to the unsatisfactory system. Moreover, the management and operation ability of the undertaker is also uneven, which affects the income of state-owned capital.

  Peng Huagang, spokesman of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, said that the main task in the next step is to deepen the reform of state-owned enterprises, urge enterprises to better improve efficiency and create benefits, and make these shares transferred to the social security fund obtain tangible benefits.

  Li Jin, chief researcher of China Enterprise Research Institute, told the First Financial Reporter that the biggest challenge will be how to preserve and increase the value, how to pay dividends and how to collect the proceeds. Generally speaking, the allocation of state-owned assets to social security funds is positive from a big perspective, and the problems brought about by it need to be designed at the institutional level.

  How to make "huge deposits" play its due role, industry analysis, on the one hand, state-owned enterprises should better improve efficiency, create benefits and create value by accelerating reforms, so that these shares transferred to social security funds can obtain tangible benefits. On the other hand, the equity dividends of the transferred enterprises will be the main source of income for social security funds from the transfer of state-owned assets. The dividend level of listed companies in China is not high, and it is necessary to further increase the dividend ratio of state-owned enterprises in order to play the role of ensuring the transfer of funds.

  The first financial reporter learned that in order to standardize the operation and management of transferring some state-owned capital, enrich the social security fund and strengthen the supervision of the operation and management of transferring state-owned capital, the Ministry of Finance is taking the lead in drafting the operation and management measures for transferring state-owned capital.

  Before the introduction of the management measures for the transfer of state-owned capital, the cash income generated by the transfer of state-owned capital can be invested by the undertaker, and the scope of investment is limited to bank deposits, the purchase of government bonds in the primary market and the capital increase of the transferred object. At the same time, all levels of finance, human resources and social security, state-owned assets supervision and other relevant departments will strengthen cooperation, earnestly perform their duties, strengthen supervision and management of the undertakers, and ensure that the transferred state-owned capital is earmarked to make up for the gap in the basic endowment insurance fund for enterprise employees.

  When managing this part of assets, asset security should be the primary goal. Li Jin said that this part of the state-owned assets transferred to social security should be operated safely to ensure the preservation and appreciation of state-owned assets. These assets need to be handed over to professionals for operation, and they can participate in projects with good benefits and stable income in the supply-side structural reform.

Test drive of pure electric SUV that can refuel BYD Tang DM-i

  [Aika Auto New Energy Channel Original]

  Since its official release at the beginning of this year, BYD’s DM-i hybrid technology has quickly gained the attention of a large number of consumers. The sales of Qin PLUS DM-i and Song PLUS DM-i, which were listed in advance, are hot, and even the demand exceeds the supply. The Tang DM-i, which debuted at the finale, will be officially launched at the 2021 Shanghai Auto Show, which opened on April 19th, and we have been the first to test drive this DM-i flagship model with ultra-low fuel consumption.

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

  Compared with the previously listed 2021 Tang DM, the new car Tang DM-i has basically not changed in appearance and interior. In view of the fact that most of my friends are already very familiar with the design of Tang DM-i, so this time let’s get to the point and talk about the performance of DM-i hybrid technology in this big guy.

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Byd DM-i hybrid technology

Byd DM-i hybrid technology

Byd DM-i hybrid technology

Byd DM-i hybrid technology

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

 

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i

Test drive BYD Tang DM-i